Skip to main content

Amazon EC2: How much less userfriendly can you make it?

This morning I read about the new Amazone Elastic Compute Cloud service. It's basically a cluster of Xen VPSes, done right.

At least that's what I thought until I actually tried to use it.

Let's see:

  1. Sign up for AWS
  2. Sign up for S3
  3. Create certs
  4. Download tools
  5. Export 3 EC2 environment variables
  6. Oh, hell. Tools are in java. Switch to windows box since I don't have the patience to figure out installing Java 1.5 on debian right now.
  7. Repeat steps 4-5
  8. Export JAVA_HOME
  9. Run ec2-describe-images
  10. Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/amazon/aes/webservices/client/cmd/DescribeImages

Looks like I get to try to fix the classpath for them. How retro-cool can you get? It's just like 1999!

Bah. Next time, use Python, guys.

update:: Apparently they didn't even bother testing on windows and their script was just plain broken. Way to go.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Shrug. It took me less than twenty minutes - on a Windows machine - from first hearing about EC2 to having an instance up and running apache & mysql with one of my apps on it.
Anonymous said…
Er, if you're running Debian and you can't figure out how to install Java, perhaps you shouldn't be messing with something like EC2... Or Debian for that matter!
Anonymous said…
heh. I know this is over a year old, but yeah, if you can't figure out how to install java on debian (which is about as easy as it gets), then I dunno why you decided to tackle this.

It isn't like you need to know java to use these tools. Hell, I hate java(and love Python). But that's hidden from you, with these tools. Gotta think that more people with Windows will have java than python already anyway.

Seriously, what's hard about 'sudo apt-get install sun-java6-bin'?

Popular posts from this blog

Why schema definition belongs in the database

Earlier, I wrote about how ORM developers shouldn't try to re-invent SQL . It doesn't need to be done, and you're not likely to end up with an actual improvement. SQL may be designed by committee, but it's also been refined from thousands if not millions of man-years of database experience. The same applies to DDL. (Data Definition Langage -- the part of the SQL standard that deals with CREATE and ALTER.) Unfortunately, a number of Python ORMs are trying to replace DDL with a homegrown Python API. This is a Bad Thing. There are at least four reasons why: Standards compliance Completeness Maintainability Beauty Standards compliance SQL DDL is a standard. That means if you want something more sophisticated than Emacs, you can choose any of half a dozen modeling tools like ERwin or ER/Studio to generate and edit your DDL. The Python data definition APIs, by contrast, aren't even compatibile with other Python tools. You can't take a table definition

Python at Mozy.com

At my day job, I write code for a company called Berkeley Data Systems. (They found me through this blog, actually. It's been a good place to work.) Our first product is free online backup at mozy.com . Our second beta release was yesterday; the obvious problems have been fixed, so I feel reasonably good about blogging about it. Our back end, which is the most algorithmically complex part -- as opposed to fighting-Microsoft-APIs complex, as we have to in our desktop client -- is 90% in python with one C extension for speed. We (well, they, since I wasn't at the company at that point) initially chose Python for speed of development, and it's definitely fulfilled that expectation. (It's also lived up to its reputation for readability, in that the Python code has had 3 different developers -- in serial -- with very quick ramp-ups in each case. Python's succinctness and and one-obvious-way-to-do-it philosophy played a big part in this.) If you try it out, pleas

A review of 6 Python IDEs

(March 2006: you may also be interested the updated review I did for PyCon -- http://spyced.blogspot.com/2006/02/pycon-python-ide-review.html .) For September's meeting, the Utah Python User Group hosted an IDE shootout. 5 presenters reviewed 6 IDEs: PyDev 0.9.8.1 Eric3 3.7.1 Boa Constructor 0.4.4 BlackAdder 1.1 Komodo 3.1 Wing IDE 2.0.3 (The windows version was tested for all but Eric3, which was tested on Linux. Eric3 is based on Qt, which basically means you can't run it on Windows unless you've shelled out $$$ for a commerical Qt license, since there is no GPL version of Qt for Windows. Yes, there's Qt Free , but that's not exactly production-ready software.) Perhaps the most notable IDEs not included are SPE and DrPython. Alas, nobody had time to review these, but if you're looking for a free IDE perhaps you should include these in your search, because PyDev was the only one of the 3 free ones that we'd consider using. And if you aren